🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad protest both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence similar discussions in additional member states